Australia: ASIC encourages retirement calculations that allow for maintaining living standards

| 19 Jun 2019

The Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) has amended the relief conditions for superannuation and retirement calculators. Specifically, ASIC has removed the requirement that superannuation and retirement calculators discount at a fixed rate of CPI - 2.5% - and instead encourages providers of these tools to use a higher rate that allows for rising community living standards beyond keeping up with inflation.

Though it sounds uninteresting, the difference can actually be significant, says financial research and actuarial firm Rice Warner. The policy change from ASIC is a big win (following more than two years of consultation) for the industry and providers of these calculators everywhere.

Rice Warner says in a statement that the key takeaway is that ASIC has confirmed the importance of maintaining living standards (not purchasing power) in retirement. This is important, because it may overstate retirement balances by as much as 50% relative to using a wage deflator.

The new rule, that takes effect on 5 December 2019, requires providers to supply a default inflation rate that also reflects cost increases. This way users can decide if future retirement assets or income are adequate.

Indexing to wages

Rice Warner says that price-based discounting may be disadvantageous for full career projections as the government-run Age Pension is indexed to wages and will grow in real terms over the entire period. Under such a scenario, researchers will find that the Age Pension will sufficiently cover most of the adequate benchmark.

There is also near universal support for maintaining indexation of the Age Pension to wages, given that it would quickly reduce below community expectations were it to be indexed to prices.

Despite this, there is a growing body of research suggesting that, given that the actual expenditure of retirees is likely to fall during retirement, wage-based indexation sets too high a standard. This argument is reasonable (given expectations on expenditure across the three phases of retirement) though the evidence based on available data is mixed as few good longitudinal datasets are available and much of the analysis relies on cross-sectional studies or limited longitudinal studies that rely on small samples over short periods of time.

Overall, the impact of price-based discounting in retirement only is smaller as the time horizon is shorter. It is a reasonable assumption for public policy work though our preference is to use wages throughout for online tools and calculators to avoid confusing consumers and to show the Age Pension as flat in real terms.

According to Rice Warner, the ongoing debate about discounting during the retirement phase shows that more work needs to be done before industry and policy makers can agree on the right assumption.

This work should focus on understanding the spending needs of retirees in different cohorts (or generations), sensitivities around these assumptions (for example, differing needs of renters and homeowners, singles and couples) and how these spending needs change throughout retirement including the transition to aged care.


You might enjoy reading these:

17th APLIC:"Work with Mission, Serve with Passion"

AIA rewards Malaysians for sleeping!

Each pill costs $5,000 - Multiple Sclerosis treatment option

For the full suite of stories and updates, always check in to our Facebook / LinkedIn. Click the following if you want to improve your sales, learn how to be a better leader, or you just need some motivation to kick start your engine.

Do you have a new product or programme to share? Or perhaps you are keen to explore any collaborations with us or our partners?  Reach out to us at